Scale able class D 1250W UCD style and Non-UCD style - PCB Ready. Tested.

clbiondo

New member
Good, I had a good experience with this ucd, the sound is good at low volume, but when increasing the volume it distorts the sound is inaudible too, since I reviewed everything and do not think the problem, using esou irf 540N and 50 +50 volts. Anyone ever had this problem? Thanks a lot!
 

norazmi

diysmps Senior Member
Yes i do, adding 1nf caps at input will help reduce the noise, another thing is i did little modification, hmmm but it also help almost no noise coming out. the mod at LM311 pin 5 and 6 tight together with pin 8.
 

clbiondo

New member
Norazmi, as did the layout and pcb you posted at the start of the topic, have checked all has no bad component, but it only works well in low volume, when I increase the volume it distorts much, it's like I was failing to the positive cycle the speaker is pulled into ...
 

norazmi

diysmps Senior Member
clbiondo post super clear picture of ur pcb, back side and top. details about ur setup, what output inductor, filter caps, etc etc... mosfet use, gate resistor and all :D . It should not happen like that, something wrong with it.
 

norazmi

diysmps Senior Member
one more, if u have too much solder flux at ur pcb it will also effect the pwm, so make sure u clear it up, hehehehe :D
 

pergo

New member
i was thinking at the LT1016 or MAX1016.
It work at maximum +-7V (typical +-5V), has 2 output (in phase, and out of phase), good PSRR, propagation delay of 10ns.
It need maximum care in the circuit layout if you want very high switching speed, but it can do it pretty well.
http://cds.linear.com/docs/Datasheet/1016fc.pdf

Price is 6$ but is one of the best comparator in the market.
The 0-180° output semplify the level shifters for IR2010. --> less components

So, it will be simpler but better.

Comparator is critical in the UCD-style performances.
 

norazmi

diysmps Senior Member
Yep i have with me couple LT1016 and others, i`ve order it last time with small value to make test, but i dont finish yet, maybe im forgot to try it. Well i can do it again with this comparator, the problem with LM311 is produce lots of noise coming at output and its lots different between non-ucd style by using TL074 and ir2110 almost no noise coming out even u did ugly wiring inside the amp case. But fully discrete ucd style is good and less noise coming out, easy part and cheap driver but with many components :D .
 

pergo

New member
you can make an hybryd :D discrete comparator + integrated gate driver. eheheheh

I don't know why LM311 is noisy. Do you use a HF prefilter for the input signal? Something like RC 1k+680pF.
 

norazmi

diysmps Senior Member
Lol... hmmm HYBRID sounds like good idea hehehehe :D . discrete comparator hurmmmm... -)

Nope i not try it yet with HF filter, i did connect bal/strobe to vdd, its reduce the noise and 1nf at input but it will reduce hi freq a little.
 

pergo

New member
HF prefilter is a "must" in this application circuit. It help to provide a ground node for the noise.
May be not the solution, but is a "good advice" in this kind of project.
I use it also in classAB amplifier.

You see noise at the comparator output when the audio signal is idle? (but the oscillation is started...so 50% duty, without modulation..so you can see the squarewave clearly).


What about LM311 supply's hard decoupling? I mean: bypass near power supply pin + power supply highly filtered (for example, by a capacitance multiplier + zener reference)
 

norazmi

diysmps Senior Member
idk, but so far i`ve build simplest class D amp using lm311 always will face noise problem, but if we drive woofer using low pass there is no problem. But for full range there will be lots of adjustment needed to minimize the noise. Yet so far i did not face noise problem with TL074 non-ucd and discrete ucd amp, they all passed. its not about LM311 supply as i already did separate it with external supply so i can see the different but its same LM311 still generate noise. i can pass the noise problem but there will be little modification at bal/strobe , input section etc... hahahaha i think better try with LT1016 or other comparator.
 

norazmi

diysmps Senior Member
i`ll do another experiment with new comparator, wanna see the different, i`ll look into my inventory which one i have, i think i have LT1011 and LT1016, let see. But i still like more with non-ucd style TL074 + ir2110, silent, powerfull and efficient. But no one did the totem pole driver yet with IR2110 hmmmm...
 

pergo

New member
which is the switching frequency in the 2 project? i mean, this UCD-style, and the TL+IR style.
 

norazmi

diysmps Senior Member
ucd style, the TL074 is working good already. But ucd still got problem with noise, and ir become more worst when u put 2 modules inside case. so need to find solution for it. for the non-ucd the FB is taken before the output filter, its working exactly like irs2092 chips but irs2092 chips have more build in such as protection and non-ucd is not.

but i receive 2 pcs class H modules, i need to prepare to get this monster work hehe :D i think i will start new thread with it, then i will continue ucd mods to get better performance.

regards.
 

pergo

New member
maybe the layout is the problem.
There are two fundamental "ground plane" to make

The first is the signal/output ground (GND): you've to use a plane to connect comparator, input signal, and level shifter. Al least, the output capacitor.

Then, the second, there's is a "power ground" that is "ground" for the power stage but not a real ground (i mean, 0 volt): it's -HV. You've to connect the IR2010, the phase shifter pull-down, the output mosfet


Final: hard decoupling. +HV to -HV, +HV to GND, -HV to GND with electrolitic+film, and the op-amp voltages

Can you post some waveforms?

I need:

- pwm before LC filter (if you can, at 50% duty, so no signal)
- output signal after the LC.


If your noise goes up when you put more IR modules in the same chassis, i think in a layout problem so your pcb is a little antenna.
 

norazmi

diysmps Senior Member
pergo at the meantime i`ll hold this project for a while since i need to start with earlier project with 2kw class H amp that i have it at diysmps. I`m now prepared with component list to start with stereo module 2 x 2kwrms class H amp. This will be my first class H amp with high power version.

So this project class D will put on hold until i`m finish class H amp. Btw i would like to invite u and others to join with class H builder thread i`ll soon open it.

regards,
Azmi.
 
Top